ISSN 2335-2388 Online

Ethics and Malpractice Statement

EDITORIAL BOARD of the journal is guided by the publication ethics provided by COPE:

The Committee on Publication Ethics,

Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors


REVIEWERS are expected to follow COPE provided: Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers


AUTHORS wishing to publish articles in Respectus Philologicus are encouraged to follow the principles of academic ethics provided by the European Commission: 

Ethics for Researchers (European Commission. Brussels, 2007)

Code of Academic Ethics of Vilnius University (Vilnius, 2006)

The Main Ethical Principles of Publication for Authors

Scientific activities shall be based on the ideals of honest research and truth seeking. Such provision shall be violated by:

1. forgery and falsification of or manipulation with empirical research data;

2. deliberate concealment of received data contradicting the research hypothesis;

3. provision of deliberately misleading information about empirical research methodology;

4. plagiarism, i.e. using another person’s words or ideas without giving credit to that person or that person’s work. This includes using text, figures, tables, or ideas, and includes not just duplicating any of these items but also close paraphrasing of text that still represents someone else’s ideas or work;

5.1. inaccurate significance of co-authorship. All co-authors who made a significant contribution must be listed as such. If other persons contributed to e.g. a research project, the document shall acknowledge their contribution;

5.2. unmeasured forcing younger colleagues or subordinates to accept co-authorship.


All rights and responsibilities of authors, reviewers and editors, as well as consequences of misconduct is detected or reported.








The periodical is published twice a year:  April 25 and October 25.


Submissions for the autumn issue are accepted until June 1, 

and for the spring issue until December 1.